Cut vs Uncut

[JustAChubbyGuy]

That is exactly the way I tried in my experiment. I usually use a full "fist" method - sometimes two hands. I surmised that using the fist method would not be the same as you mentioned that, other than the anal ring, there is an empty feeling. I did find however, that the top of the "ring" formed by thumb and forefinger did touch the base of my head, which I find is very sensitive when aroused. It did take a little longer to cum than usual. I should point out that both during intercourse, and MB, I very really penetrate multiple times. By this I mean that while MB I rub up and down the shaft only, with the top of my fist touching my head on the upward stroke. Obviously during intercourse my whole erect penis moves in and out (but not fully out) of the vagina. Of course, if my partner contracts or squeezes her vagina then the lips will grip my shaft firmer. (I should imagine in a similar way to the anal ring)

Yeah, you see, the very act of having to rub up and down the entire shaft (long stroking) is, what I personally believe, a direct consequence of being circumcised. As I have not stuck my penis into a vagina before, and having been on the receiving end of a penis, I would prefer if the person does not long stroke me. This could be due to how the anus does not produce any lubricating fluids of its own whatsoever, so when the lube runs a bit dry, long stroking kind of creates a burning sensation around the anal ring, thus causing soreness after sex. Thus, I would rather if the person made shorter strokes.

Having bottomed for both circumcised and intact penises, I must say that the intact penises were a lot gentler. This could possibly be due to the glans being stimulated by the gliding action of the foreskin inside my anus instead of having my anal ring do the stimulation. Then again, I acknowledge that the preference to long stroke differs between person to person and I am simply making a generalisation based on my own experiences.

[Chronos]

I was cut when I was born, but the doctor left enough of my foreskin in tact that I can actually masturbate without needing lube (if I have to). It's very handy, because it cut down on a lot of potentially embarrassing moments as a teen in my moms house xD. I prefer to stay they way I am, because there is enough foreskin that you can pump rather easily, but not too much that it gets in the way. Being bisexual, seeing an uncut penis looks more appealing to me.

[DukeNicky]

I'm uncut and would really want to know what is it like to be cut before really doing it. Leaving the glans bare + friction with underpants = contant hard on or lost of sensitivity? How about itch due to pubic hair? From where I'm from most guys are cut and they tend to adjust indiscreetly as if it is a norm. Btw, what are the cons of being cut? Other than the procedure going wrong and being scarred for life.

You'll have youre glans dried out and have less sensitivity on since its dry already. Also, the gliding motion and sensitivity of the foreskin obviously would be removed. I personally advise for you not to undergo such procedure. It is way better to look natural down there for me.

I completely disagree here. I was circumcised at 14 due to a severe case of phimosis and with talking to the urologist and what I had learned I demanded the doc circumcise me instead of trying alternative treatments. Best decision I had ever made (only wish my mum had chosen this option after birth so that I never had to go through all of this in the first place. There is ZERO decline in penile sensitivity of the glans whatsoever. You can trust me on this from personal experience. For the first few weeks or so you'll "feel" a lot more sensations of the glans as it touches the fabric of your clothing, but you'll become accustomed to this. Now it does also depend on what style of circumcision you go for and what/how much is removed that will determine how things feel best to your "new" dick. To "test out" life as a circumcised bloke you can tape back your foreskin.

Now in my personal experience with having bottomed for both cut and uncut I can tell you that a cut dick feels much better with the flared mushroomed head. the foreskin just keeps bunching up and moving too much which caused me quite a bit of pain, with the circumcised dick there was no spare skin that could be "pumped" so it was more taught and felt much better. That is how my own circ is. High and Tight with little shaft skin movement.

[jg93]

I am uncut and would not want it any other way.

[bigguyatNYU]

I was originally intended to be left intact, but had problems retracting my foreskin as a toddler. I had a circumcision/surgery when I was 4 or 5 to eliminate this problem and have wished ever since that I had been left uncut. I've read online that sometimes it takes until puberty to be able to full pull back your foreskin, and that some guys must work on doing so. I wish that I had been given that opportunity.

I suppose I prefer uncut because it is natural, seems to be easier to masturbate that way, and it sounds as if the supposed increased sensitivity is superior.

[Brendan]

Grass is always greener, right?
I'm cut, but would like to see what my dick would look and feel like if I were uncut.

[eramtew]

I'm cut and always liked it that way (still won't complain, a penis is a penis) but now that I'm older I really wish I hadn't been circumcised. In some ways I'm glad I can never really know what I'm missing out on cause I can deal not knowing, but if I could compare, I'm sure I'd be pretty damn upset. Unless I had phimosis. I don't know, but it looks uncomfortable.

[seqiro]

I would like to thank everyone that took the time to reply and answer A lot of good information here.

Opinions are as varied as the individuals that gave them. Very bravo.

[ellboy642]

I'm cut and always liked it that way (still won't complain, a penis is a penis) but now that I'm older I really wish I hadn't been circumcised. In some ways I'm glad I can never really know what I'm missing out on cause I can deal not knowing, but if I could compare, I'm sure I'd be pretty damn upset. Unless I had phimosis. I don't know, but it looks uncomfortable.

I know how you feel. You can try restoring your foreskin btw.

[shadow_flare]

Grass is always greener, right?
I'm cut, but would like to see what my dick would look and feel like if I were uncut.

Was part of the reason I decided to restore.
In the end, the results are different for all restorers. As are the satisfaction levels of the individual as I have learned from others.

Consider looking into restoring if you are interested.

[Vanjones]

I am uncut, or should I say intact. My dad, who is cut, told me that he was glad to give me that gift, he was the only person who didn't want me circumcised and luckily he won. I am SO glad I'm intact. My girlfriend can pull back my foreskin and give me the most mind-blowingly intense blowjobs that I doubt a cut guy could experience. In my youth I have to say that it was much more difficult to be happy and proud of my foreskin. None of my friends were intact and I always felt VERY insecure about my penis. Getting naked when changing as a kid and into puberty was always a nightmare. "shrimp dick" "turtleneck" were common words used to tease me. It didn't help I was a late bloomer and I'm a little on the small side. Now I'm 3-4" soft and 6" hard, but I wasn't always. Life can be tough for an uncut kid. I really liked it when I learned to masturbate, though. Jerking off the foreskin over your glans is so easy and no messy lube needed. I MBed a LOT when I was a kid, shot a lot of semen. When i first started, I could go from soft to ejaculating in less than a minute. But I was also afraid girls would freak out at it, or that they would think I was weird, or worse; spread it all over school! All of my girlfriends to date have said I'm their first intact guy. Actually all of them have said they preferred mine. But they could be just saying that. I know that sometimes being able to cum quicker is better for girls when they're trying to give you a hand or blow job. They don't want to be sucking for a half an hour, so I think it helps to have more sensitivity. I'm glad for boys growing up now, a lot more parents are choosing not to mutilate their sons and some hospitals now strongly discourage parents from doing it. Hopefully there will be more intact little boys in the showers and changing rooms so they don't feel so alone like I did.

[gavonreno]

I've always loved being uncut. I remember playing with my foreskin as a kid... I played with it so much that I could retract it fully around the time I was 5 years old. When I was a teenager, I never understood why other kids needed lube or lotion to masturbate, until I found out what a circumcised penis looked like. At first I thought the other kid's penis had a defect, but then he asked me what it was like to have a foreskin and said that he wished he was intact, which is when I realized that it was actually cut off from him. Nobody ever teased me or anything for having it. Until I was about 12, all the penises I had seen were uncut, so a circumcised penis just looked weird to me... kind of still does, because in the past few years I've left the US and lived in Germany and other parts of Europe, where almost nobody is cut. I'd never circumcise my kids... even if I felt the benefits were worth cutting off part of his body, I would just be too worried that it would go wrong.

[LPW]

Thought I would post this for those of us in the US. According to a new study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, on average circumcision has been in decline for some 30 years in the US. This study only counts circumcisions performed in the hospital though. The stats are pretty interesting, the percentages vary by regions.

Fair use:
"There are regional variations as well. In 2010, about 71 percent of babies in the Midwest were circumcised, 66.3 percent in the Northeast, 58.4 percent in the South, and 40.2 percent in the West."

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national ... kin/68617/
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-204_162-575 ... rn-states/
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/2 ... declining/

[Squeeze]

This is great news, man! thanks for sharing

[BigBoy83]

I love being uncut and wouldn't have any other way.

[Kio3j2]

I'm cut, I got circumcised around 10 years old I believe, something about my forces kin couldn't get pulled all the way back. -sigh- I wish I was uncut.

[edm732]

I'm uncut and prefer to be uncut. I prefer things as they come.

[Decks]

I'm uncut and prefer to be uncut. I prefer things as they come.

Then why does it say your cut in your profile lol

[edm732]

LOL I want so much to be uncut that I'm delirious... You are right I'm cut, almost never speak english, I should be more careful before submit.

[dreamito]

I am uncut, THANKS GOD. I feel that if I were cut, I would feel like almost killing my parents!

So you can guess how much I prefer being uncut.

[Decks]

I am uncut, THANKS GOD. I feel that if I were cut, I would feel like almost killing my parents!

So you can guess how much I prefer being uncut.

I think you like your foreskin lol
I love my restored one. I still have a ways to go but i love what I have gained

[BigBoy83]

Do you have any before and after pics??? Was and still am very curious about the whole foreskin restoration thing...

[Decks]

I do have pics but they are in the Active Members part of the forum.
I really need to update pics though.

[johnnyG]

I am uncut and would prefer to be uncut

[johnnyoceans]

I am cut and i believe it is better some girls think an uncut dick is weird no girls think a cut dick is weird

[Decks]

that is because US women have been raised to like a mutilated penis over the real thing. They do not know the true feeling (unless they have had sex with an intact man) of an uncut penis.

[iroselyem]

I think I should weigh in on this one, even though I've held back to this point. I am cut, and don't have a problem with it, and I don't necessarily think uncut guys should be cut. It's a matter of perspective. I don't feel that my sensitivity has been compromised AT ALL (I'm incredibly sensitive, and my orgasms are mindblowing and leave me gasping for air), and I'm sure uncut guys are just as sensitive.

I do have to say, however, that I get a little defensive when some people refer to it as mutilation, when I don't feel that's the case at all. My father was Jewish and wanted his sons to be circumcised, and my mother wanted it as a matter of cleanliness (and we have to admit, it IS cleaner to be cut, since the foreskin folds have been removed, and they tend to be a trap for sebum and urine). I realize some people compare circumcision to ear piercing in girls, but I agree that it's much more invasive than that, and can have serious repercussions for the boy if it's not done properly.

But for whatever reason it's done (and it's a personal one, to be made by well-informed parents and the man if he chooses to do it as an adult), I don't think it's fair to vilify and shame the people who make that decision, or those who never had a chance to make it. I would hate to think that some of the men who come here for support and advice would come away from any thread and see themselves as flawed and imperfect in some way. I don't think that's what the spirit of this site is about, and what we should be doing. Either by genetics or design, we all have the bodies we have, and I think the more fair thing to do would be to avoid trying to instill any negative feelings about those things on anyone else.

I'm not trying to lecture anyone by saying this, but I think some of the comments here have been a little too much for such a sensitive topic.

Thanks.