Cut vs Uncut

[daldude97]

I was cut at birth and voted that I would prefer to be uncut. It's not so much that I think I'm missing on pleasure, per se, just that it would be nice to be natural and there would be more to things to play with. Plus I wouldn't need lube to MB.

[utguy]

I was cut at 28. Before being cut I was fairly hair trigger sensitive and could ejaculate within a couple of minutes whether having sex with someone or solo MB. Edging was very difficult to do. After being cut it was the exact opposite. My surgeon warned me that it might take awhile for some nerves to reconnect. Within a few months I was back to normal in terms of sensitivity although now being a quite mature adult, it takes quite a while to manually stimulate myself to a full erection.

[ellboy642]

To the uncut guys here, I just want to ask what do you feel inside your underwear during erections when your foreskin retracts. Does it feel good that you become more aroused or does it bother you? Does it hurt in anyway? Thank you.

[Shieldsy]

I'm cut and I said that I'd like to be uncut.
I'm not one of those people that is horrified with circumcision and is grossly offended with my parents or anything, they thought that they were doing the right thing. The only thing I wish is that I had been able to have a say in the matter and truly consider it.

Moving along...

I'm slowly restoring my foreskin (on and off [not 100% committed like some]) one of the reasons being that I think a foreskin is an attractive part of a guys dick and most of the time, qualities that I deem attractive in other guys I think I'll like for myself.... That's not the only reason of course - I've heard that sensitivity greatly differs between the circumcised and uncircumcised, and that having a foreskin allows your cock head to dekeratinize, which in my opinion increases it's attractiveness.

[Virtuvian]

Uncut !!! although circumcised penis can prolong the ejac but we can do alot of thing with the skin hahaaa

[RonaldReagan]

I want to be circumcised! I want it done incredibly tight, with the scar line as far back as possible to preserve the sensitive inner foreskin.

[focus]

I want to be circumcised! I want it done incredibly tight, with the scar line as far back as possible to preserve the sensitive inner foreskin.

Why would you want that?

If you want to preserve sensitive areas, circumcision is the complete opposite of what you are wanting.

[cielomoreno]

I'm cut, sometimes it looks like I'm uncut when flaccid which is crazy.

[laurent]

Im uncut, but my brother was cut and very unhappy about it. My parents decided not to put me through what he went through-thanks god. I think my bro having a smaller penis is due to being cut at birth and just not having enough skin to grow during puberty. I think the problem is cutting kids when they have no say, cause even if your fine with being cut your kids might not be, and nobody wants their kids to resent them. With the internet, alot of people are able to actually get info that the foreskin is important and that alot of people are upset that they were circumsized. I think by the time I have kids (10-15years) in America it will be the norm to not cut your kids even if you were cut for the same reason that uncut guys used to get their kids circed: they want their kids to fit in, and most guys will be uncut. Anyways, uncut prefer uncut.

[Decks]

RonaldReagan - That makes no sense at all... Being Cut does NOT preserve sensitivity... that is
The only way that you will keep your sensitivity is by staying intact!

laurent - Your brother penis is smaller because he is cut. A cut male is about .5 in smaller than an intact male (dont quote me on that. I read that some where). Americans don't like change... The AAP is pushing Circumcision like it should be done to every single male in the world... I cannot wait till I have restored and I will be part of the NORMAL men in the World.

[kurosaki1]

To the uncut guys here, I just want to ask what do you feel inside your underwear during erections when your foreskin retracts. Does it feel good that you become more aroused or does it bother you? Does it hurt in anyway? Thank you.

Hey! Uncut here. When the skin retracts inside my boxer briefs, it produces the most interesting sensation, like my frenulum is being licked. It is amazing, and other than my gf licking it, I can't reproduce that feeling. It arouses me everytime!

Doesn't hurt at all!

[JDboarder]

As I already posted a few months ago, I'm cut but partially restored. My penis still looks like it's circumcised but just with a little extra skin. Sometimes, my skin will all by itself cover over half of my glans like I'm intact and it feels so good. Having something touching (almost hugging) my glans like that just feels so comforting and natural. I can't wait until I can have that feeling 24/7

[focus]

To the uncut guys here, I just want to ask what do you feel inside your underwear during erections when your foreskin retracts. Does it feel good that you become more aroused or does it bother you? Does it hurt in anyway? Thank you.

Hey! Uncut here. When the skin retracts inside my boxer briefs, it produces the most interesting sensation, like my frenulum is being licked. It is amazing, and other than my gf licking it, I can't reproduce that feeling. It arouses me everytime!

Doesn't hurt at all!

Wow, that sounds amazing! Unfortunately,I'm circumcised, but I do have a bit of frenulum left which is incredibly sensitive, so I can sort of imagine what you are talking about. That sensation would make me hard all the time! I guess you get used to it, otherwise uncut guys would be walking around with boners all the time. Still, sounds very nice, and I must say, I'm envious!

[kurosaki1]

To the uncut guys here, I just want to ask what do you feel inside your underwear during erections when your foreskin retracts. Does it feel good that you become more aroused or does it bother you? Does it hurt in anyway? Thank you.

Hey! Uncut here. When the skin retracts inside my boxer briefs, it produces the most interesting sensation, like my frenulum is being licked. It is amazing, and other than my gf licking it, I can't reproduce that feeling. It arouses me everytime!

Doesn't hurt at all!

Wow, that sounds amazing! Unfortunately,I'm circumcised, but I do have a bit of frenulum left which is incredibly sensitive, so I can sort of imagine what you are talking about. That sensation would make me hard all the time! I guess you get used to it, otherwise uncut guys would be walking around with boners all the time. Still, sounds very nice, and I must say, I'm envious!

Yup, the feeling is really different! It only happens every once in a while, on accident, never on purpose, so the feeling is always unxepected.

[be22]

I'm loosely cut, when flaccid the skin bunches a bit near the head. I would not mind having a bit of extra skin, but I have enough to slide around when erect. I've looked into restoration, but the methods are a bit extreme for me!

[gymguy]

Deleted. Post had absolutely nothing to do with being cut or uncut!!

AGT

[Decks]

I'm loosely cut, when flaccid the skin bunches a bit near the head. I would not mind having a bit of extra skin, but I have enough to slide around when erect. I've looked into restoration, but the methods are a bit extreme for me!

Hahahaha not really sure using your hands to restore some more skin is extreme now, do you?

Yes I know strapping a device onto my penis is a bit over board but one has got to do, what one has got to do.

[be22]

I'm loosely cut, when flaccid the skin bunches a bit near the head. I would not mind having a bit of extra skin, but I have enough to slide around when erect. I've looked into restoration, but the methods are a bit extreme for me!

Hahahaha not really sure using your hands to restore some more skin is extreme now, do you?

Yes I know strapping a device onto my penis is a bit over board but one has got to do, what one has got to do.

Manual tugging is alright, but almost always leads me to MB. Plus I don't have the discipline to do it consistently. When did you start restoring, how far along are you? I'm curious as always...

[Decks]

I'm loosely cut, when flaccid the skin bunches a bit near the head. I would not mind having a bit of extra skin, but I have enough to slide around when erect. I've looked into restoration, but the methods are a bit extreme for me!

Hahahaha not really sure using your hands to restore some more skin is extreme now, do you?

Yes I know strapping a device onto my penis is a bit over board but one has got to do, what one has got to do.

Manual tugging is alright, but almost always leads me to MB. Plus I don't have the discipline to do it consistently. When did you start restoring, how far along are you? I'm curious as always...

Yeah Manual can lead to MB. I started in 2011 and have been at it for 2 years now. I have some slight coverage and a higher sensitivity than before I started.

[Tzel]

I listed 'uncut' in my profile since it's what I think I MOSTLY am, though if I remember correctly what I was told by my dad several years ago, I had a sort of partial-circumcision. I have enough foreskin that the glans is entirely covered when I'm flaccid, though it rolls back when I'm erect.

Haven't really bothered looking into restoration, since things feel pretty awesome as it is.

[Decks]

Hey Tzel,
yeah you could of had just the ridged banned cut off. Which is sometimes what knowing parent, but scared parents get. If I saw you in the locker room I would guess you were still intact. You are very lucky to have coverage when flacid. Restoring could help you out a bit if you want some extra skin to play with

[seqiro]

Some interesting experiences here

Good topic!

[JustAChubbyGuy]

I want to be circumcised! I want it done incredibly tight, with the scar line as far back as possible to preserve the sensitive inner foreskin.

As one who was intact then circumcised at 18 years old (a rite of manhood), I would say that I prefer being intact. After circumcision, I realise that I have lost a lot of sensitivity in my penis as the glans became tougher and rougher from constant rubbing against underwear fabric. How do I know this - the glans used to be too sensitive to rub with a towel after showering, now, I can probably feel the same sensitivity if I rub it against sandpaper, and I am not exaggerating.

[AGT]

I want to be circumcised! I want it done incredibly tight, with the scar line as far back as possible to preserve the sensitive inner foreskin.

As one who was intact then circumcised at 18 years old (a rite of manhood), I would say that I prefer being intact. After circumcision, I realise that I have lost a lot of sensitivity in my penis as the glans became tougher and rougher from constant rubbing against underwear fabric. How do I know this - the glans used to be too sensitive to rub with a towel after showering, now, I can probably feel the same sensitivity if I rub it against sandpaper, and I am not exaggerating.

Does the less sensitivity of the glans not make it easler to "last longer" when having intercourse? Perhaps both gay and straight guys can respond to this question. I believe that being cut helps me "last longer" - I'm straight.

Maybe those who were cut later in life could also comment.

[JustAChubbyGuy]

I want to be circumcised! I want it done incredibly tight, with the scar line as far back as possible to preserve the sensitive inner foreskin.

As one who was intact then circumcised at 18 years old (a rite of manhood), I would say that I prefer being intact. After circumcision, I realise that I have lost a lot of sensitivity in my penis as the glans became tougher and rougher from constant rubbing against underwear fabric. How do I know this - the glans used to be too sensitive to rub with a towel after showering, now, I can probably feel the same sensitivity if I rub it against sandpaper, and I am not exaggerating.

Does the less sensitivity of the glans not make it easler to "last longer" when having intercourse? Perhaps both gay and straight guys can respond to this question. I believe that being cut helps me "last longer" - I'm straight.

Maybe those who were cut later in life could also comment.

Well, AGT, yes it does help me last longer during intercourse but I feel that it is not a beneficial thing? How do I explain this, hmm. Let's say, having had anal sex (I'm gay) both before and after circumcision, I felt that while intact, I could do more gentle pumping whereas after being circumcised, I felt that I needed more stimulation to ejaculate. In other words, I needed rougher sex - which I acknowledge, may not be a bad thing for some - but I felt that I wasn't getting as much pleasure out of sex as I had previously.

WARNING: GRAPHIC DESCRIPTION BELOW.

For example, the pleasure points on the penis during anal sex is where the anus opening is - the inside of the anus feels empty and not like the vagina where the inside grips you as well. Therefore, I believe that when I was intact, I only needed to gently pump the last 2 inches of my penis or so into my mate's ass while the glans is stimulated by my foreskin moving back and forth. However, after being circumcised, I realised that I needed to do long stroking - the act of pulling out almost entirely before pushing back in - so that the glans is stimulated by the anal ring as well. Also, because of the need to long stroke in order to achieve orgasm, I believe that I am a lot more rougher than before with my bottom's ass.

This is just my experiences though.

[AGT]

I want to be circumcised! I want it done incredibly tight, with the scar line as far back as possible to preserve the sensitive inner foreskin.

As one who was intact then circumcised at 18 years old (a rite of manhood), I would say that I prefer being intact. After circumcision, I realise that I have lost a lot of sensitivity in my penis as the glans became tougher and rougher from constant rubbing against underwear fabric. How do I know this - the glans used to be too sensitive to rub with a towel after showering, now, I can probably feel the same sensitivity if I rub it against sandpaper, and I am not exaggerating.

Does the less sensitivity of the glans not make it easler to "last longer" when having intercourse? Perhaps both gay and straight guys can respond to this question. I believe that being cut helps me "last longer" - I'm straight.

Maybe those who were cut later in life could also comment.

Well, AGT, yes it does help me last longer during intercourse but I feel that it is not a beneficial thing? How do I explain this, hmm. Let's say, having had anal sex (I'm gay) both before and after circumcision, I felt that while intact, I could do more gentle pumping whereas after being circumcised, I felt that I needed more stimulation to ejaculate. In other words, I needed rougher sex - which I acknowledge, may not be a bad thing for some - but I felt that I wasn't getting as much pleasure out of sex as I had previously.

WARNING: GRAPHIC DESCRIPTION BELOW.

For example, the pleasure points on the penis during anal sex is where the anus opening is - the inside of the anus feels empty and not like the vagina where the inside grips you as well. Therefore, I believe that when I was intact, I only needed to gently pump the last 2 inches of my penis or so into my mate's ass while the glans is stimulated by my foreskin moving back and forth. However, after being circumcised, I realised that I needed to do long stroking - the act of pulling out almost entirely before pushing back in - so that the glans is stimulated by the anal ring as well. Also, because of the need to long stroke in order to achieve orgasm, I believe that I am a lot more rougher than before with my bottom's ass.

This is just my experiences though.

Ah yes, that makes sense. I always surmised that a guys arse hole would be a lot tighter that the average sized vagina ( which can stretch dramatically), thus generating a lot more stimulation as one was pushing into it to penetrate. Although I don't really see the need to be rougher at all. I can (and do) give long, leisurely strokes as well as short, sharp quick strokes, with my partners - all female. Neither method requires me to be any rougher, than my normal loving, gentle style.

[JustAChubbyGuy]

Ah yes, that makes sense. I always surmised that a guys arse hole would be a lot tighter that the average sized vagina ( which can stretch dramatically), thus generating a lot more stimulation as one was pushing into it to penetrate. Although I don't really see the need to be rougher at all. I can (and do) give long, leisurely strokes as well as short, sharp quick strokes, with my partners - all female. Neither method requires me to be any rougher, than my normal loving, gentle style.

Well, not really, it's only the penetration that generates stimulation. The inside of a guy's arse kind of feels like empty space haha. Maybe what I meant was that I have to use long and fast strokes so that my glans is stimulated by the anal ring in order to reach orgasm whereas, when I was intact, I was able to reach orgasm simply with short leisurely strokes. Does that make sense? Haha.

[AGT]

Ah yes, that makes sense. I always surmised that a guys arse hole would be a lot tighter that the average sized vagina ( which can stretch dramatically), thus generating a lot more stimulation as one was pushing into it to penetrate. Although I don't really see the need to be rougher at all. I can (and do) give long, leisurely strokes as well as short, sharp quick strokes, with my partners - all female. Neither method requires me to be any rougher, than my normal loving, gentle style.

Well, not really, it's only the penetration that generates stimulation. The inside of a guy's arse kind of feels like empty space haha. Maybe what I meant was that I have to use long and fast strokes so that my glans is stimulated by the anal ring in order to reach orgasm whereas, when I was intact, I was able to reach orgasm simply with short leisurely strokes. Does that make sense? Haha.

Having never poked my dick up any arse, I can only rely on your description of what it feels like. I did MB this morning by gripping my shaft tightly by my hand in a manner that I would imagine my shaft would be gripped by an arse hole, if I was having sex. Other than I the fact that I could feel my shaft being more tightly gripped, the MB sensation/session was the same as usual.

I should point out that I MB'd both as an experiment and because I felt horny.

[JustAChubbyGuy]

Having never poked my dick up any arse, I can only rely on your description of what it feels like. I did MB this morning by gripping my shaft tightly by my hand in a manner that I would imagine my shaft would be gripped by an arse hole, if I was having sex. Other than I the fact that I could feel my shaft being more tightly gripped, the MB sensation/session was the same as usual.

I should point out that I MB'd both as an experiment and because I felt horny.

Hmmm, I believe you are gripping your penis wrongly. How I would recreate the sensation of anal sex is to simply use the forefinger and the thumb to create an O (refer to attached photo). This represents the anal ring. You do not use the other fingers at all. The best way to create this shape would be to do the classic OK sign with the middle, ring, and little finger pointing outwards from your palm.

Try MB-ing with this and see how you are unable to stimulate the glans unless by long stroking or penetrating the O multiple times.

Then imagine being intact. Now you realise that even though you are deep into the arse, the anal ring kind of pushes and pulls the foreskin back and forth over your glans simply using the base of your penis shaft.

Feel free to share your experience after you have tried this.

[AGT]

Having never poked my dick up any arse, I can only rely on your description of what it feels like. I did MB this morning by gripping my shaft tightly by my hand in a manner that I would imagine my shaft would be gripped by an arse hole, if I was having sex. Other than I the fact that I could feel my shaft being more tightly gripped, the MB sensation/session was the same as usual.

I should point out that I MB'd both as an experiment and because I felt horny.

Hmmm, I believe you are gripping your penis wrongly. How I would recreate the sensation of anal sex is to simply use the forefinger and the thumb to create an O (refer to attached photo). This represents the anal ring. You do not use the other fingers at all. The best way to create this shape would be to do the classic OK sign with the middle, ring, and little finger pointing outwards from your palm.

Try MB-ing with this and see how you are unable to stimulate the glans unless by long stroking or penetrating the O multiple times.

Then imagine being intact. Now you realise that even though you are deep into the arse, the anal ring kind of pushes and pulls the foreskin back and forth over your glans simply using the base of your penis shaft.

Feel free to share your experience after you have tried this.

That is exactly the way I tried in my experiment. I usually use a full "fist" method - sometimes two hands. I surmised that using the fist method would not be the same as you mentioned that, other than the anal ring, there is an empty feeling. I did find however, that the top of the "ring" formed by thumb and forefinger did touch the base of my head, which I find is very sensitive when aroused. It did take a little longer to cum than usual. I should point out that both during intercourse, and MB, I very really penetrate multiple times. By this I mean that while MB I rub up and down the shaft only, with the top of my fist touching my head on the upward stroke. Obviously during intercourse my whole erect penis moves in and out (but not fully out) of the vagina. Of course, if my partner contracts or squeezes her vagina then the lips will grip my shaft firmer. (I should imagine in a similar way to the anal ring)